Dating Again After Divorce

What you are carrying

How do I know if they're lying, after a marriage that ended in lies?

You usually can't know from a look, a pause or a hunch, and nobody reliably can. What you can do is track whether their words and actions line up over time, and learn which of your alarms belong to this person and which still belong to the marriage.

You usually can’t tell whether someone is lying from their face, their pauses or the feeling in your gut, and neither can almost anyone else. What you can do is watch whether their words and actions match over weeks and months, and learn to sort the alarms this new person sets off from the ones that still belong to your marriage.

That second part is the real work, and it’s very doable.

Why does everything feel like a lie now?

Picture Renee, 46, two years out of a 15-year marriage that ended when she found the second phone. She’s been seeing Marcus for three months. He’s kind, he shows up, and last Tuesday he said he was “just tired” and wanted a quiet night. Renee spent that night replaying every quiet night her ex ever asked for.

Nothing Marcus did was strange. But Renee’s history taught her that ordinary words can cover a whole hidden life, so now ordinary words feel like a cover.

She’s not alone in where she’s coming from. In a national survey of 650 divorced Australians, most men and women named emotional reasons for the end of their marriage, a group that included communication problems and infidelity.1 If dishonesty was part of how your marriage broke, your mind learned to scan for it. That scanning made sense then. The question is whether it’s reading this person, or replaying that one.

It also helps to know how unusual heavy lying is between close partners. In a week-long diary study, Bella DePaulo and Deborah Kashy found that people told fewer lies to the people they felt closest to, and lied less than once in every 10 interactions with spouses and children.2 They also felt more uncomfortable lying to close partners, and those lies were more often discovered.2 What happened in your marriage was real. It was also not the baseline for everyone you’ll ever date.

Can you actually spot a lie?

Not the way movies promise. A major review of deception research combined 1,338 estimates of 158 possible cues to lying.3 Liars were, on average, a bit less forthcoming and told less compelling stories, but many of the behaviors people watch for showed no clear link, or only a weak one, to deceit.3

So the phone face down, the glance away, the pause before answering: those aren’t readings of honesty. They’re habits, and some of them are your ex’s habits that you’ve learned to fear.

Doesn’t being suspicious at least keep me safe?

Less than it feels like. Deception researcher Timothy Levine, reviewing work that goes back to studies of romantic partners in 1990, describes a trade-off: suspicion makes people better at catching lies, but worse at recognizing the truth, and the gains and losses largely cancel out.4

That’s the hidden cost of high alert. If someone is mostly telling you the truth, and most partners mostly are, constant suspicion means you’ll misread a lot of honest moments as dishonest ones. You stay braced, they feel accused, and you still don’t know more than you did.

There’s a kinder twist here too. In studies by Tsachi Ein-Dor and Adi Perry, people higher in attachment anxiety (the worry-about-closeness kind) were actually more accurate at detecting deceitful statements than others.5 Your sensitivity may be a real skill. The problem isn’t that your radar is broken. It’s that after a marriage like yours, it fires at everything, including shadows.

So what does real inconsistency look like?

It looks like something you could describe to a friend without mentioning how you felt. Four things to keep separate:

  • What happened. “He said he’d call after his shift. He didn’t, and he didn’t mention it the next day.”
  • Your reading. “He’s hiding something.”
  • The fear. “This is the second phone all over again.”
  • The next step. “Ask him, once, plainly.”

Real inconsistency tends to be specific and repeated: a story with details that shift each time it’s told, plans that keep falling through with explanations that don’t fit together, money promises that never land, or someone who gets angry or vague whenever you ask a simple question. A single quiet night, a slow reply or a phone face down is not on that list.

Even a real pattern doesn’t tell you what’s in their head. It tells you there’s a gap between what they say and what happens, and that you deserve a straight conversation about it. If the answers keep not matching, you can decide what you’re willing to live with. You don’t need a confession to make that decision.

What if I’m the one checking up on them?

Many people coming out of a dishonest marriage feel the pull to check: their location, their phone, their social media. The urge is a signal about how frightened you are, not a reading of what they’re doing. Checking also tends to backfire. Finding nothing rarely calms the fear, and finding something ambiguous feeds it.

The reverse matters too. If the person you’re seeing checks your phone, tracks where you are, or reacts in ways that leave you afraid to ask questions, that’s not about your divorce. That’s about safety, and the support line on this page is there for exactly that.

When is it more than ordinary wariness?

Some caution after a marriage like yours is healthy and fades as safe experiences pile up. But if the suspicion is constant, if it keeps you up at night, gets in the way of work or friendships, or follows you into every new relationship no matter how the person behaves, that’s a good time to talk to a licensed mental-health professional. That isn’t a judgment on you. Betrayal can leave a mark that’s easier to work through with help.

What the research can’t tell you

  • The lie-detection studies used strangers and lab clips, not partners you’ve known for months.
  • The diary study was about everyday lies, not affairs or hidden finances.
  • The attachment-anxiety findings were lab results, and they don’t mean any one hunch of yours is right.
  • The divorce survey was Australian and from the late 1990s, so it shows a broad picture, not your story.

What to do this week

  • Play the sort above, then make your own version for the past seven days.
  • Keep a two-column note: what happened, and what it reminded you of. Look at the second column first. It’s usually where the marriage lives.
  • Ask one plain question about a real gap, using a script above, and listen to the whole answer before you decide what it means.
  • Let one old alarm go without investigating it. Notice that nothing bad happens.

Try it

Evidence or old fear? Sort what you've noticed about the person you're seeing

  1. 1/6 He said Friday was his daughter's recital, then a friend posted a photo of him at a bar that night.

    Evidence. That's a specific gap between what was said and what happened. It isn't proof of anything yet, but it's fair to ask about.

  2. 2/6 She put her phone face down on the table, exactly like my ex used to.

    Old fear. The gesture is borrowed from your marriage. Plenty of people do it for no reason at all. One habit is not a record.

  3. 3/6 When I asked casually about his weekend, the story changed twice in a month.

    Evidence. Details shifting over time is a pattern you can point to. It earns a calm, direct question, not a verdict.

  4. 4/6 She seems too good to be true, and so did my ex at the start.

    Old fear. That's the marriage grading a stranger. 'Good so far' isn't a warning sign on its own. Consistency over months is the real test.

  5. 5/6 He's said he'll pay back the $400 'next week' three weeks running.

    Evidence. A repeated promise that keeps not happening is observable. You don't need to read his mind to say what you've noticed.

  6. 6/6 She took four hours to text back and my stomach dropped.

    Old fear. The drop in your stomach is real, and it tells you about your history. A slow reply, by itself, says nothing about honesty.

0 to 2 right

The old marriage is doing the sorting

Right now the fear and the facts feel like the same thing. That's common after a marriage that ended in lies, and it's exactly why writing down what actually happened, separate from what it felt like, helps so much.

3 to 4 right

You can see the difference, mostly

You can tell a mismatch from a memory most of the time, and a few old alarms still slip through. Notice which ones. They usually rhyme with something specific from the marriage.

5 to 6 right

Your radar is sharper than you think

You can tell what someone did from what it reminded you of. The next step is to trust that skill out loud, by asking about the real gaps and letting the old fears pass without a trial.

This is one moment. BUMIS is for the dating patterns you keep seeing in yourself.See your pattern

Steal this text

Say it in your own words, or start from these

  • If something doesn't add up and you want to ask without accusing

    Can I ask you something without it being a big deal? You mentioned Friday was the recital, and then I saw a photo from that night that confused me. I'd rather just ask you than spin about it. What happened?

  • If the alarm is old and you want to own it

    Heads up, something small set off an old alarm in me today. It came from my marriage, not from anything you did. I'm telling you so I don't act weird about it, not because I need you to explain anything.

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Eli J. Finkel

Research on how modern marriage and long term relationships work, and what partners expect from each other.

Professor of Psychology and of Management and Organizations, Northwestern University; director of the Relationships and Motivation Lab · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Julie Menanno

How couples get stuck in conflict cycles and how to feel secure with a partner.

Licensed marriage and family therapist (MA, LMFT, LCPC); author of Secure Love · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Lori Gottlieb

What happens in the therapy room, including breakups, dating choices and the stories people tell about love.

Psychotherapist; author of Maybe You Should Talk to Someone and The Atlantic's Dear Therapist column · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Pepper Schwartz

Research and writing on love, sex and relationships, including dating and partnership later in life.

Sociologist (PhD, Yale); Professor Emerita of Sociology, University of Washington · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 8 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. Towards understanding the reasons for divorceAustralian Institute of Family Studies, 2003Used for: Drawing on the Australian Divorce Transitions Project, a random national telephone survey of 650 divorced Australians conducted in late 1997, the majority of men and women named affective reasons (communication problems, incompatibility, changed lifestyle desires and infidelity) as the main reason their marriage ended.
  2. Everyday lies in close and casual relationshipsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (DePaulo and Kashy), 1998Used for: 77 undergraduates and 70 community members kept diaries of their social interactions and lies for a week. People told fewer lies per interaction to those they felt closer to, lied less than once per 10 interactions with spouses and children, felt more uncomfortable lying to close partners, and lies told to closer partners were more often discovered.
  3. Cues to deceptionPsychological Bulletin (DePaulo, Lindsay, Malone, Muhlenbruck, Charlton and Cooper, via PubMed), 2003Used for: A meta-analysis of 1,338 estimates of 158 possible cues to deception. Liars were in some ways less forthcoming and told less compelling stories, but many behaviors showed no discernible links, or only weak links, to deceit.
  4. Distrust, False Cues, and Below-Chance Deception Detection Accuracy: Commentary on Stel et al. (2020) and Further Reflections on (Un)Conscious Lie Detection From the Perspective of Truth-Default TheoryFrontiers in Psychology (Timothy R. Levine, via PubMed Central), 2021-07Used for: Levine reviews research, going back to McCornack and Levine's 1990 work with romantic partners, showing that suspicion and distrust lower accuracy in judging truths while raising accuracy in judging lies, so the gains and losses largely cancel out; he also argues that behavioral cues are generally non-diagnostic.
  5. Anxiously attached people are ace at poker and lie detectionBritish Psychological Society Research Digest (reporting Ein-Dor and Perry, Journal of Personality), 2013Used for: In Ein-Dor and Perry's studies, attachment anxiety, but not other kinds of anxiety, predicted more accurate detection of deceitful statements among 202 people watching interactions with subtle cues and 58 people watching clips without such cues, and predicted more money won by 35 semiprofessional poker players.
Up nextShould I stay if my new partner cheats?